Turkey vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Turkey
127,542 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
107,887 t
in 2024
Turkey rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Turkey
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922024

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 127,542 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 19,655 t.

That makes Turkey's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turkey ahead.

Turkey ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Turkey averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkey Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 8,635 t 8,078 t 557.24 t Turkey
1970s 9,962 t 13,967 t 4,004 t Zimbabwe
1980s 23,694 t 11,144 t 12,550 t Turkey
1990s 28,091 t 69,278 t 41,187 t Zimbabwe
2000s 43,579 t 80,574 t 36,995 t Zimbabwe
2010s 79,857 t 91,276 t 11,418 t Zimbabwe
2020s 129,491 t 101,426 t 28,065 t Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Turkey or Zimbabwe?
Turkey, at 127,542 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Turkey and Zimbabwe?
19,655 t, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkey and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Turkey and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Turkey ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkey vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/turkiye/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/turkiye/zimbabwe/">Turkey vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.