Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Rwanda
8,419 t
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
8,600 t
in 2024
Rwanda rank
123rd
Saudi Arabia rank
122nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Rwanda
  • Saudi Arabia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 8,600 t against 8,419 t in Rwanda, a difference of 181 t.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 123rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 122nd of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,090 t 1,019 t 70.96 t Rwanda
1970s 1,785 t 1,988 t 203.36 t Saudi Arabia
1980s 2,674 t 4,089 t 1,416 t Saudi Arabia
1990s 2,652 t 4,880 t 2,228 t Saudi Arabia
2000s 5,179 t 5,121 t 58.13 t Rwanda
2010s 6,283 t 7,872 t 1,589 t Saudi Arabia
2020s 8,017 t 8,280 t 263.1 t Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Rwanda or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 8,600 t against 8,419 t in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
181 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Saudi Arabia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Rwanda ranks 123rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 122nd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/rwanda/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/rwanda/saudi-arabia/">Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.