Northern Europe vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Northern Europe
223,506 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
107,887 t
in 2024
Northern Europe rank
24th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Northern Europe
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922024

How they compare

Northern Europe currently reports 223,506 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 115,619 t.

That makes Northern Europe's figure about 2.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.

Northern Europe ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 30 groups.

Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Europe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 146,344 t 8,078 t 138,266 t Northern Europe
1970s 180,574 t 13,967 t 166,607 t Northern Europe
1980s 196,310 t 11,144 t 185,166 t Northern Europe
1990s 228,871 t 69,278 t 159,593 t Northern Europe
2000s 205,161 t 80,574 t 124,587 t Northern Europe
2010s 216,065 t 91,276 t 124,789 t Northern Europe
2020s 223,827 t 101,426 t 122,401 t Northern Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Northern Europe or Zimbabwe?
Northern Europe, at 223,506 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Northern Europe and Zimbabwe?
115,619 t, with Northern Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Northern Europe and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Northern Europe ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Europe vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/northern-europe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/northern-europe/zimbabwe/">Northern Europe vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.