Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Mauritius
163.57 t
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
167.28 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
216th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
215th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Mauritius
  • Trinidad and Tobago
100200300400196119922024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 167.28 t against 163.57 t in Mauritius, a difference of 3.71 t.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Mauritius ranks 216th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 215th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 165.15 t 233.41 t 68.26 t Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 200.17 t 243.66 t 43.49 t Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 110.05 t 250.12 t 140.07 t Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 203.8 t 178.79 t 25 t Mauritius
2000s 213.01 t 128.48 t 84.53 t Mauritius
2010s 169.1 t 166.24 t 2.86 t Mauritius
2020s 154.32 t 165.32 t 11 t Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Mauritius or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 167.28 t against 163.57 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago?
3.71 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Mauritius ranks 216th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 215th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/mauritius/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/mauritius/trinidad-and-tobago/">Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.