Lesotho vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Lesotho
192.42 t
in 2024
Suriname
217.55 t
in 2024
Lesotho rank
207th
Suriname rank
205th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Lesotho
  • Suriname
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 217.55 t against 192.42 t in Lesotho, a difference of 25.13 t.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 207th and Suriname ranks 205th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 1,274 t 139.3 t 1,135 t Lesotho
1970s 1,671 t 152.69 t 1,518 t Lesotho
1980s 2,187 t 204.63 t 1,983 t Lesotho
1990s 589.63 t 317.62 t 272 t Lesotho
2000s 554.05 t 244.03 t 310.02 t Lesotho
2010s 401.69 t 257.07 t 144.62 t Lesotho
2020s 214.34 t 248.23 t 33.9 t Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Lesotho or Suriname?
Suriname, at 217.55 t against 192.42 t in Lesotho as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Lesotho and Suriname?
25.13 t, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Lesotho and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Lesotho ranks 207th and Suriname ranks 205th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/lesotho-2/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/lesotho-2/suriname/">Lesotho vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.