Lebanon vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Lebanon
4,076 t
in 2024
Namibia
4,021 t
in 2024
Lebanon rank
145th
Namibia rank
147th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Lebanon
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922024

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 4,076 t against 4,021 t in Namibia, a difference of 55 t.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Lebanon ranks 145th and Namibia ranks 147th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,672 t 2,478 t 805.56 t Namibia
1970s 905.58 t 3,560 t 2,655 t Namibia
1980s 1,595 t 4,052 t 2,457 t Namibia
1990s 2,615 t 4,929 t 2,314 t Namibia
2000s 5,529 t 5,080 t 449.42 t Lebanon
2010s 4,811 t 3,897 t 914.55 t Lebanon
2020s 4,555 t 3,463 t 1,093 t Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Lebanon or Namibia?
Lebanon, at 4,076 t against 4,021 t in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Lebanon and Namibia?
55 t, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Lebanon and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Lebanon ranks 145th and Namibia ranks 147th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/lebanon/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/lebanon/namibia/">Lebanon vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.