Eswatini vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Eswatini
2,126 t
in 2024
Palestine
2,114 t
in 2022
Eswatini rank
162nd
Palestine rank
165th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Eswatini
  • Palestine
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119922024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2,126 t against 2,114 t in Palestine, a difference of 12 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Eswatini ranks 162nd and Palestine ranks 165th of 250 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 1,629 t 1,771 t 141.3 t Palestine
2000s 1,668 t 1,109 t 558.93 t Eswatini
2010s 1,801 t 1,356 t 444.89 t Eswatini
2020s 1,767 t 2,106 t 338.88 t Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Eswatini or Palestine?
Eswatini, at 2,126 t against 2,114 t in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Eswatini and Palestine?
12 t, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Palestine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Eswatini ranks 162nd and Palestine ranks 165th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/">Eswatini vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.