Cape Verde vs Mauritius: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Cape Verde
105.92 t
in 2024
Mauritius
163.57 t
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
219th
Mauritius rank
216th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Mauritius
0100200300400196119922024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 163.57 t against 105.92 t in Cape Verde, a difference of 57.65 t.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.5 times Cape Verde's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 219th and Mauritius ranks 216th of 250 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 25.33 t 165.15 t 139.82 t Mauritius
1970s 35.33 t 200.17 t 164.83 t Mauritius
1980s 35.51 t 110.05 t 74.54 t Mauritius
1990s 65.33 t 203.8 t 138.47 t Mauritius
2000s 92.63 t 213.01 t 120.39 t Mauritius
2010s 96.31 t 169.1 t 72.79 t Mauritius
2020s 106.83 t 154.32 t 47.49 t Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Cape Verde or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 163.57 t against 105.92 t in Cape Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Cape Verde and Mauritius?
57.65 t, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mauritius?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Mauritius rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Cape Verde ranks 219th and Mauritius ranks 216th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Mauritius: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/cabo-verde/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/cabo-verde/mauritius/">Cape Verde vs Mauritius: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.