Cabo Verde vs China, Macao SAR: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Cabo Verde
105.92 t
in 2024
China, Macao SAR
119.85 t
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
219th
China, Macao SAR rank
217th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • China, Macao SAR
0100200300196119922024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 119.85 t against 105.92 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 13.93 t.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 219th and China, Macao SAR ranks 217th of 250 countries.

China, Macao SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde China, Macao SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 25.33 t 104.3 t 78.96 t China, Macao SAR
1970s 35.33 t 202.55 t 167.21 t China, Macao SAR
1980s 35.51 t 111.61 t 76.09 t China, Macao SAR
1990s 65.33 t 205.56 t 140.23 t China, Macao SAR
2000s 92.63 t 168.19 t 75.57 t China, Macao SAR
2010s 96.31 t 130.62 t 34.31 t China, Macao SAR
2020s 106.83 t 121.46 t 14.64 t China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Cabo Verde or China, Macao SAR?
China, Macao SAR, at 119.85 t against 105.92 t in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Cabo Verde and China, Macao SAR?
13.93 t, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and China, Macao SAR?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cabo Verde and China, Macao SAR rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Cabo Verde ranks 219th and China, Macao SAR ranks 217th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs China, Macao SAR: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/cabo-verde-2/china-macao-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/cabo-verde-2/china-macao-sar/">Cabo Verde vs China, Macao SAR: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.