Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Argentina
540,944 t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand
525,773 t
in 2024
Argentina rank
6th
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia and New Zealand
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k196119922024

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 540,944 t against 525,773 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 15,171 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 6th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th of 250 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 405,308 t 190,609 t 214,699 t Argentina
1970s 434,124 t 323,566 t 110,559 t Argentina
1980s 457,003 t 319,096 t 137,907 t Argentina
1990s 469,497 t 381,293 t 88,204 t Argentina
2000s 497,914 t 432,006 t 65,908 t Argentina
2010s 470,435 t 466,929 t 3,506 t Argentina
2020s 536,718 t 462,772 t 73,947 t Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Argentina or Australia and New Zealand?
Argentina, at 540,944 t against 525,773 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
15,171 t, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Argentina ranks 6th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/">Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.