Latvia vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Latvia
0.0438 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Tunisia
0.0443 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
102nd
Tunisia rank
101st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Latvia
  • Tunisia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0443 t per square kilometre against 0.0438 t per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 101st of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1314 t per square kilometre 0.0424 t per square kilometre 0.0889 t per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0489 t per square kilometre 0.0492 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0429 t per square kilometre 0.0542 t per square kilometre 0.0113 t per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Latvia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0443 t per square kilometre against 0.0438 t per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Latvia and Tunisia?
0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Latvia ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 101st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/latvia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/latvia/tunisia/">Latvia vs Tunisia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.