Estonia vs Nigeria: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Estonia
0.0537 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Nigeria
0.053 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
88th
Nigeria rank
89th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Estonia
  • Nigeria
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0537 t per square kilometre against 0.053 t per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0007 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 88th and Nigeria ranks 89th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Nigeria Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1291 t per square kilometre 0.0447 t per square kilometre 0.0845 t per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.0667 t per square kilometre 0.052 t per square kilometre 0.0147 t per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.055 t per square kilometre 0.0557 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Estonia or Nigeria?
Estonia, at 0.0537 t per square kilometre against 0.053 t per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Estonia and Nigeria?
0.0007 t per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Nigeria?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Estonia and Nigeria rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Estonia ranks 88th and Nigeria ranks 89th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Nigeria: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/estonia/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/estonia/nigeria/">Estonia vs Nigeria: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.