Estonia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Estonia
0.0537 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Guinea-Bissau
0.0517 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
88th
Guinea-Bissau rank
90th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Estonia
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0537 t per square kilometre against 0.0517 t per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.002 t per square kilometre.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 88th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 90th of 167 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1291 t per square kilometre 0.0266 t per square kilometre 0.1025 t per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.0667 t per square kilometre 0.0348 t per square kilometre 0.032 t per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.055 t per square kilometre 0.0438 t per square kilometre 0.0112 t per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Estonia or Guinea-Bissau?
Estonia, at 0.0537 t per square kilometre against 0.0517 t per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Estonia and Guinea-Bissau?
0.002 t per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Estonia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Estonia ranks 88th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guinea-bissau/">Estonia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.