Eritrea vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Eritrea
0.0425 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0438 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Eritrea rank
103rd
Latvia rank
102nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Eritrea
  • Latvia
00.10.20.3199220072023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0438 t per square kilometre against 0.0425 t per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0013 t per square kilometre.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 102nd of 167 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0252 t per square kilometre 0.1096 t per square kilometre 0.0844 t per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.032 t per square kilometre 0.0489 t per square kilometre 0.0168 t per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0384 t per square kilometre 0.0429 t per square kilometre 0.0045 t per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Eritrea or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.0438 t per square kilometre against 0.0425 t per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Eritrea and Latvia?
0.0013 t per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Latvia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do Eritrea and Latvia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Eritrea ranks 103rd and Latvia ranks 102nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/latvia/">Eritrea vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.