Australia vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Australia
0.0407 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0438 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Australia rank
104th
Latvia rank
102nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Australia
  • Latvia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0438 t per square kilometre against 0.0407 t per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0031 t per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Australia ranks 104th and Latvia ranks 102nd of 167 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0336 t per square kilometre 0.1314 t per square kilometre 0.0977 t per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0382 t per square kilometre 0.0489 t per square kilometre 0.0107 t per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0419 t per square kilometre 0.0429 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Australia or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.0438 t per square kilometre against 0.0407 t per square kilometre in Australia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Australia and Latvia?
0.0031 t per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Australia ranks 104th and Latvia ranks 102nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/">Australia vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.