South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

South Africa
0.005 t per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0065 t per person
in 2024
South Africa rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
9th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0065 t per person against 0.005 t per person in South Africa, a difference of 0.0015 t per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0062 t per person 0.0018 t per person 0.0044 t per person South Africa
1970s 0.0058 t per person 0.0023 t per person 0.0035 t per person South Africa
1980s 0.005 t per person 0.0013 t per person 0.0037 t per person South Africa
1990s 0.004 t per person 0.0063 t per person 0.0022 t per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0042 t per person 0.0065 t per person 0.0023 t per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0051 t per person 0.0064 t per person 0.0013 t per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0049 t per person 0.0063 t per person 0.0014 t per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0065 t per person against 0.005 t per person in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
0.0015 t per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
South Africa ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.