Malta vs Nigeria: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Malta
0.0002 t per person
in 2017
Nigeria
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Malta rank
127th
Nigeria rank
130th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Malta
  • Nigeria
000.0010.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Nigeria, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 127th and Nigeria ranks 130th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 t per person 0.0005 t per person 0.0003 t per person Malta
1970s 0.0007 t per person 0.0005 t per person 0.0002 t per person Malta
1980s 0.0005 t per person 0.0006 t per person 0.0001 t per person Nigeria
1990s 0.0004 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0001 t per person Malta
2000s 0.0004 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0 t per person Malta
2010s 0.0003 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0 t per person Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Malta or Nigeria?
Malta, at 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Nigeria as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Malta and Nigeria?
0 t per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nigeria?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Malta and Nigeria rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Malta ranks 127th and Nigeria ranks 130th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Nigeria: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/malta/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/malta/nigeria/">Malta vs Nigeria: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.