Malawi vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Malawi
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Palestine
0.0004 t per person
in 2022
Malawi rank
110th
Palestine rank
109th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Malawi
  • Palestine
000.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Malawi ranks 110th and Palestine ranks 109th of 167 countries.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 t per person 0.0007 t per person 0.0005 t per person Palestine
2000s 0.0002 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person Palestine
2010s 0.0003 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0 t per person Palestine
2020s 0.0004 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0001 t per person Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Malawi or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Malawi and Palestine?
0 t per person, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Malawi and Palestine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Malawi ranks 110th and Palestine ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/malawi/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/malawi/west-bank-and-gaza/">Malawi vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.