Congo vs Malaysia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Congo
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Malaysia
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Congo rank
151st
Malaysia rank
153rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Congo
  • Malaysia
0000196119922024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Malaysia, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Congo ranks 151st and Malaysia ranks 153rd of 167 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Congo
1970s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Congo
1980s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Congo
1990s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Congo
2000s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Congo
2010s 0.0002 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Congo
2020s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Congo or Malaysia?
Congo, at 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Malaysia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Congo and Malaysia?
0 t per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Malaysia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Congo ranks 151st and Malaysia ranks 153rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Malaysia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/congo-rep/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/congo-rep/malaysia/">Congo vs Malaysia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.