Afghanistan vs Grenada: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Afghanistan
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Grenada
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
124th
Grenada rank
122nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Grenada
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Afghanistan, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 124th and Grenada ranks 122nd of 167 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Grenada Difference Ahead
1960s 0.001 t per person 0.0005 t per person 0.0005 t per person Afghanistan
1970s 0.0009 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0005 t per person Afghanistan
1980s 0.001 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0008 t per person Afghanistan
1990s 0.0013 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0011 t per person Afghanistan
2000s 0.001 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0008 t per person Afghanistan
2010s 0.0006 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0003 t per person Afghanistan
2020s 0.0003 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Afghanistan or Grenada?
Grenada, at 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Afghanistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Afghanistan and Grenada?
0 t per person, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Grenada?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Grenada rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Afghanistan ranks 124th and Grenada ranks 122nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Grenada: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/afghanistan/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/afghanistan/grenada/">Afghanistan vs Grenada: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.