Serbia and Montenegro vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Serbia and Montenegro
-3.79 % change on previous year
in 2005
Uruguay
-3.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro rank
158th
Uruguay rank
156th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Serbia and Montenegro
  • Uruguay
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports -3.52 % change on previous year against -3.79 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0.27 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.

Serbia and Montenegro ranks 158th and Uruguay ranks 156th of 209 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia and Montenegro Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5259 % change on previous year 5.33 % change on previous year 5.85 % change on previous year Uruguay
2000s -2.74 % change on previous year 6.29 % change on previous year 9.03 % change on previous year Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Serbia and Montenegro or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at -3.52 % change on previous year against -3.79 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay?
0.27 % change on previous year, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 158th and Uruguay ranks 156th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia and Montenegro vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/serbia-and-montenegro/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/serbia-and-montenegro/uruguay/">Serbia and Montenegro vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.