Central America vs Pakistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Central America
4.47 % change on previous year
in 2024
Pakistan
17.94 % change on previous year
in 2024
Central America rank
8th
Pakistan rank
7th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Central America
  • Pakistan
-10010203040196219932024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 17.94 % change on previous year against 4.47 % change on previous year in Central America, a difference of 13.47 % change on previous year.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 4.0 times Central America's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Central America ahead.

Central America ranks 8th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 30 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central America Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 4.63 % change on previous year 1.91 % change on previous year 2.72 % change on previous year Central America
1970s 3.06 % change on previous year 1.5 % change on previous year 1.57 % change on previous year Central America
1980s 4.62 % change on previous year 4.17 % change on previous year 0.4508 % change on previous year Central America
1990s 1.76 % change on previous year 4.65 % change on previous year 2.88 % change on previous year Pakistan
2000s 2.12 % change on previous year 6.91 % change on previous year 4.79 % change on previous year Pakistan
2010s 1.89 % change on previous year 4.05 % change on previous year 2.16 % change on previous year Pakistan
2020s 2.35 % change on previous year 4.11 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Central America or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 17.94 % change on previous year against 4.47 % change on previous year in Central America as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Central America and Pakistan?
13.47 % change on previous year, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Central America and Pakistan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Central America ranks 8th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central America vs Pakistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/central-america/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/central-america/pakistan/">Central America vs Pakistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.