Réunion vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Réunion
7,600 An
in 2006
Suriname
7,229 An
in 2024
Réunion rank
208th
Suriname rank
211th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Réunion
  • Suriname
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922024

How they compare

Réunion currently reports 7,600 An against 7,229 An in Suriname, a difference of 371 An.

That makes Réunion's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Réunion ahead.

Réunion ranks 208th and Suriname ranks 211th of 250 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Réunion averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Réunion Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 12,560 An 6,825 An 5,735 An Réunion
1970s 8,382 An 7,744 An 638 An Réunion
1980s 5,367 An 8,645 An 3,278 An Suriname
1990s 5,286 An 14,426 An 9,139 An Suriname
2000s 6,743 An 10,223 An 3,480 An Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Réunion or Suriname?
Réunion, at 7,600 An against 7,229 An in Suriname as of 2006.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Réunion and Suriname?
371 An, with Réunion ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Réunion and Suriname?
46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
How do Réunion and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Réunion ranks 208th and Suriname ranks 211th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Réunion vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/reunion-2/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/reunion-2/suriname/">Réunion vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.