Peru vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Peru
1.38 million An
in 2024
Uganda
1.40 million An
in 2024
Peru rank
56th
Uganda rank
54th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Peru
  • Uganda
500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M1.5M196119922024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1.40 million An against 1.38 million An in Peru, a difference of 14,940 An.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 54th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 613,471 An 408,578 An 204,894 An Peru
1970s 716,366 An 542,374 An 173,992 An Peru
1980s 748,299 An 518,516 An 229,783 An Peru
1990s 721,178 An 585,500 An 135,678 An Peru
2000s 1.04 million An 933,200 An 108,274 An Peru
2010s 1.33 million An 1.27 million An 67,218 An Peru
2020s 1.32 million An 1.34 million An 19,060 An Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Peru or Uganda?
Uganda, at 1.40 million An against 1.38 million An in Peru as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Peru and Uganda?
14,940 An, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uganda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Peru and Uganda rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Peru ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 54th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/peru/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/peru/uganda/">Peru vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.