New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

New Caledonia
13,393 An
in 2024
North Macedonia
12,787 An
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
193rd
North Macedonia rank
195th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • New Caledonia
  • North Macedonia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 13,393 An against 12,787 An in North Macedonia, a difference of 606 An.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 193rd and North Macedonia ranks 195th of 250 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 22,260 An 76,363 An 54,103 An North Macedonia
2000s 19,388 An 62,718 An 43,330 An North Macedonia
2010s 16,761 An 35,251 An 18,490 An North Macedonia
2020s 14,069 An 14,731 An 661.8 An North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, New Caledonia or North Macedonia?
New Caledonia, at 13,393 An against 12,787 An in North Macedonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
606 An, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
New Caledonia ranks 193rd and North Macedonia ranks 195th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/new-caledonia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/new-caledonia/north-macedonia/">New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.