Georgia vs Honduras: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Georgia
325,114 An
in 2024
Honduras
326,708 An
in 2024
Georgia rank
118th
Honduras rank
117th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Georgia
  • Honduras
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922024

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 326,708 An against 325,114 An in Georgia, a difference of 1,594 An.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Honduras ahead.

Georgia ranks 118th and Honduras ranks 117th of 250 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Honduras Difference Ahead
1990s 286,275 An 368,879 An 82,604 An Honduras
2000s 395,721 An 393,218 An 2,503 An Georgia
2010s 299,542 An 341,972 An 42,429 An Honduras
2020s 262,908 An 335,377 An 72,469 An Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Georgia or Honduras?
Honduras, at 326,708 An against 325,114 An in Georgia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Georgia and Honduras?
1,594 An, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Honduras?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Honduras rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Georgia ranks 118th and Honduras ranks 117th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Honduras: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/georgia/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/georgia/honduras/">Georgia vs Honduras: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.