Burundi vs Nepal: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Burundi
3.14 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
3.38 An per square kilometre
in 1990
Burundi rank
60th
Nepal rank
58th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Burundi
  • Nepal
1234196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 3.38 An per square kilometre against 3.14 An per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0.24 An per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Burundi ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 58th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 2.1 An per square kilometre 2.24 An per square kilometre 0.1355 An per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 3.25 An per square kilometre 2.91 An per square kilometre 0.3324 An per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 3.17 An per square kilometre 3.34 An per square kilometre 0.1742 An per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 2.34 An per square kilometre 3.38 An per square kilometre 1.05 An per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Burundi or Nepal?
Nepal, at 3.38 An per square kilometre against 3.14 An per square kilometre in Burundi as of 1990.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Burundi and Nepal?
0.24 An per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Nepal?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Burundi and Nepal rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Burundi ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 58th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Nepal: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/burundi/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/burundi/nepal/">Burundi vs Nepal: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.