How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Italy: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Belarus

8.4 An per square kilometre

in 2023

Italy

8.59 An per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

23rd

Italy rank

22nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

Belarus
Italy

How they compare

Italy currently reports 8.59 An per square kilometre against 8.4 An per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.19 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.

Belarus ranks 23rd and Italy ranks 22nd of 167 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1990s	9.56 An per square kilometre	15.96 An per square kilometre	6.4 An per square kilometre	Italy
2000s	7.19 An per square kilometre	13.91 An per square kilometre	6.72 An per square kilometre	Italy
2010s	8.66 An per square kilometre	10.06 An per square kilometre	1.4 An per square kilometre	Italy
2020s	8.5 An per square kilometre	9.14 An per square kilometre	0.6372 An per square kilometre	Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Belarus or Italy?: Italy, at 8.59 An per square kilometre against 8.4 An per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Belarus and Italy?: 0.19 An per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?: Belarus ranks 23rd and Italy ranks 22nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Italy: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/belarus/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/belarus/italy/">Belarus vs Italy: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit: An per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.