Guinea-Bissau vs Ireland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Guinea-Bissau
2.12 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ireland
1.87 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
56th
Ireland rank
58th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Ireland
-200204060196219932024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2.12 % change on previous year against 1.87 % change on previous year in Ireland, a difference of 0.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 56th and Ireland ranks 58th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 5.43 % change on previous year 5.43 % change on previous year Ireland
1970s 1.67 % change on previous year 7.82 % change on previous year 6.15 % change on previous year Ireland
1980s 3.45 % change on previous year 0.2216 % change on previous year 3.23 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1990s 3.64 % change on previous year 4.82 % change on previous year 1.17 % change on previous year Ireland
2000s 3.7 % change on previous year -2.7 % change on previous year 6.4 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2010s 1.11 % change on previous year 1.67 % change on previous year 0.5532 % change on previous year Ireland
2020s 1.66 % change on previous year 0.6407 % change on previous year 1.02 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Guinea-Bissau or Ireland?
Guinea-Bissau, at 2.12 % change on previous year against 1.87 % change on previous year in Ireland as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Guinea-Bissau and Ireland?
0.25 % change on previous year, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Ireland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Ireland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 56th and Ireland ranks 58th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Ireland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/guinea-bissau/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/guinea-bissau/ireland/">Guinea-Bissau vs Ireland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,580 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.