Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 11.16 % change on previous year against 10.89 % change on previous year in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.27 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 30 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 19th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Democratic Republic of the Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.77 % change on previous year | -2.65 % change on previous year | 6.42 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 5.92 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | 4.31 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -2.82 % change on previous year | 2.11 % change on previous year | 4.94 % change on previous year | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 1990s | 2 % change on previous year | -6.44 % change on previous year | 8.44 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | -0.2154 % change on previous year | -1.25 % change on previous year | 1.03 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.22 % change on previous year | 3.58 % change on previous year | 2.36 % change on previous year | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 2020s | 0.209 % change on previous year | 10.89 % change on previous year | 10.68 % change on previous year | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Australia and New Zealand or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 11.16 % change on previous year against 10.89 % change on previous year in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 0.27 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 19th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.