Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
478,760 An
in 2024
Türkiye
59,965 An
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
9th
Türkiye rank
6th

Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Türkiye
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 478,760 An against 59,965 An in Türkiye, a difference of 418,795 An.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 8.0 times Türkiye's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Türkiye ranks 6th of 17 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 6 and Türkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 136,036 An 163,333 An 27,297 An Türkiye
1970s 241,227 An 135,760 An 105,467 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 414,271 An 102,876 An 311,395 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 509,178 An 45,458 An 463,720 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 637,814 An 26,388 An 611,425 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 760,521 An 25,452 An 735,069 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 584,895 An 56,940 An 527,955 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Türkiye?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 478,760 An against 59,965 An in Türkiye as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye?
418,795 An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye rank globally for edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Türkiye ranks 6th of 17 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-buffalo-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-buffalo-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkiye-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
53 places, 2,945 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crop and livestock statistics are recorded for 278 products, covering the following categories: 1) CROPS PRIMARY: Cereals, Citrus Fruit, Fibre Crops, Fruit, Oil Crops, Oil Crops and Cakes in Oil Equivalent, Pulses, Roots and Tubers, Sugar Crops, Treenuts and Vegetables. Data are expressed in terms of area harvested, production quantity and yield. Cereals: Area and production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed or silage or used for grazing are therefore excluded. 2) CROPS PROCESSED: Beer of barley; Cotton lint; Cottonseed; Margarine, short; Molasses; Oil, coconut (copra); Oil, cottonseed; Oil, groundnut; Oil, linseed; Oil, maize; Oil, olive, virgin; Oil, palm; Oil, palm kernel; Oil, rapeseed; Oil, safflower; Oil, sesame; Oil, soybean; Oil, sunflower; Palm kernels; Sugar Raw Centrifugal; Wine. 3) LIVE ANIMALS: Animals live n.e.s.; Asses; Beehives; Buffaloes; Camelids, other; Camels; Cattle; Chickens; Ducks; Geese and guinea fowls; Goats; Horses; Mules; Pigeons, other birds; Pigs; Rabbits and hares; Rodents, other; Sheep; Turkeys. 4) LIVESTOCK PRIMARY: Beeswax; Eggs (various types); Hides buffalo, fresh; Hides, cattle, fresh; Honey, natural; Meat (ass, bird nes, buffalo, camel, cattle, chicken, duck, game, goat, goose and guinea fowl, horse, mule, Meat nes, meat other camelids, Meat other rodents, pig, rabbit, sheep, turkey); Milk (buffalo, camel, cow, goat, sheep); Offals, nes; Silk-worm cocoons, reelable; Skins (goat, sheep); Snails, not sea; Wool, greasy. 5) LIVESTOCK PROCESSED: Butter (of milk from sheep, goat, buffalo, cow); Cheese (of milk from goat, buffalo, sheep, cow milk); Cheese of skimmed cow milk; Cream fresh; Ghee (cow and buffalo milk); Lard; Milk (dry buttermilk, skimmed condensed, skimmed cow, skimmed dried, skimmed evaporated, whole condensed, whole dried, whole evaporated); Silk raw; Tallow; Whey (condensed and dry); Yoghurt.