Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
478,760 An
in 2024
Myanmar
189,504 An
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
9th
Myanmar rank
8th

Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 478,760 An against 189,504 An in Myanmar, a difference of 289,256 An.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.5 times Myanmar's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Myanmar ranks 8th of 17 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 136,036 An 61,889 An 74,147 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 241,227 An 84,500 An 156,727 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 414,271 An 103,900 An 310,371 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 509,178 An 109,780 An 399,398 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 637,814 An 159,330 An 478,484 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 760,521 An 275,371 An 485,150 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 584,895 An 197,040 An 387,855 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 478,760 An against 189,504 An in Myanmar as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
289,256 An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Myanmar ranks 8th of 17 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-buffalo-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-buffalo-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of buffalo, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
53 places, 2,945 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crop and livestock statistics are recorded for 278 products, covering the following categories: 1) CROPS PRIMARY: Cereals, Citrus Fruit, Fibre Crops, Fruit, Oil Crops, Oil Crops and Cakes in Oil Equivalent, Pulses, Roots and Tubers, Sugar Crops, Treenuts and Vegetables. Data are expressed in terms of area harvested, production quantity and yield. Cereals: Area and production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed or silage or used for grazing are therefore excluded. 2) CROPS PROCESSED: Beer of barley; Cotton lint; Cottonseed; Margarine, short; Molasses; Oil, coconut (copra); Oil, cottonseed; Oil, groundnut; Oil, linseed; Oil, maize; Oil, olive, virgin; Oil, palm; Oil, palm kernel; Oil, rapeseed; Oil, safflower; Oil, sesame; Oil, soybean; Oil, sunflower; Palm kernels; Sugar Raw Centrifugal; Wine. 3) LIVE ANIMALS: Animals live n.e.s.; Asses; Beehives; Buffaloes; Camelids, other; Camels; Cattle; Chickens; Ducks; Geese and guinea fowls; Goats; Horses; Mules; Pigeons, other birds; Pigs; Rabbits and hares; Rodents, other; Sheep; Turkeys. 4) LIVESTOCK PRIMARY: Beeswax; Eggs (various types); Hides buffalo, fresh; Hides, cattle, fresh; Honey, natural; Meat (ass, bird nes, buffalo, camel, cattle, chicken, duck, game, goat, goose and guinea fowl, horse, mule, Meat nes, meat other camelids, Meat other rodents, pig, rabbit, sheep, turkey); Milk (buffalo, camel, cow, goat, sheep); Offals, nes; Silk-worm cocoons, reelable; Skins (goat, sheep); Snails, not sea; Wool, greasy. 5) LIVESTOCK PROCESSED: Butter (of milk from sheep, goat, buffalo, cow); Cheese (of milk from goat, buffalo, sheep, cow milk); Cheese of skimmed cow milk; Cream fresh; Ghee (cow and buffalo milk); Lard; Milk (dry buttermilk, skimmed condensed, skimmed cow, skimmed dried, skimmed evaporated, whole condensed, whole dried, whole evaporated); Silk raw; Tallow; Whey (condensed and dry); Yoghurt.