World vs Zimbabwe: Edible Fat Total — Food aid received
World
50 t
in 2013
Zimbabwe
30 t
in 2007
World rank
11th
Zimbabwe rank
10th
Edible Fat Total — Food aid received over time
- World
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
World currently reports 50 t against 30 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 20 t.
That makes World's figure about 1.7 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, World has been ahead every year.
World ranks 11th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 20 groups.
World has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | World | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27,919 t | 72 t | 27,847 t | World |
| 2000s | 2,780 t | 67.5 t | 2,713 t | World |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible fat total — food aid received, World or Zimbabwe?
- World, at 50 t against 30 t in Zimbabwe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in edible fat total — food aid received between World and Zimbabwe?
- 20 t, with World ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for World and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2007.
- How do World and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible fat total — food aid received?
- World ranks 11th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 20 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible Fat Total — Food aid received. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.