Namibia vs Suriname: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time
- Namibia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 2,539 kcal/cap/d against 2,500 kcal/cap/d in Namibia, a difference of 39 kcal/cap/d.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 125th and Suriname ranks 122nd of 148 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,338 kcal/cap/d | 2,613 kcal/cap/d | 275 kcal/cap/d | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2,419 kcal/cap/d | 2,641 kcal/cap/d | 221.6 kcal/cap/d | Suriname |
| 2020s | 2,499 kcal/cap/d | 2,596 kcal/cap/d | 97.25 kcal/cap/d | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Namibia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 2,539 kcal/cap/d against 2,500 kcal/cap/d in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Namibia and Suriname?
- 39 kcal/cap/d, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
- Namibia ranks 125th and Suriname ranks 122nd of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.