Australia vs Melanesia: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of

Australia
3,562 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Melanesia
2,272 kcal/cap/d
in 2024
Australia rank
14th
Melanesia rank
13th

Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time

  • Australia
  • Melanesia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200020122024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 3,562 kcal/cap/d against 2,272 kcal/cap/d in Melanesia, a difference of 1,290 kcal/cap/d.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.6 times Melanesia's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 14th and Melanesia ranks 13th of 148 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Melanesia Difference Ahead
2000s 3,285 kcal/cap/d 2,244 kcal/cap/d 1,040 kcal/cap/d Australia
2010s 3,502 kcal/cap/d 2,266 kcal/cap/d 1,236 kcal/cap/d Australia
2020s 3,511 kcal/cap/d 2,279 kcal/cap/d 1,232 kcal/cap/d Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Australia or Melanesia?
Australia, at 3,562 kcal/cap/d against 2,272 kcal/cap/d in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Australia and Melanesia?
1,290 kcal/cap/d, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Melanesia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Australia and Melanesia rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
Australia ranks 14th and Melanesia ranks 13th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Melanesia: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal/australia/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal/australia/melanesia/">Australia vs Melanesia: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,760 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.