Latvia vs Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of

Latvia
3,404 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
2,305 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Latvia rank
37th
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand rank
36th

Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time

  • Latvia
  • Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
01.0k2.0k3.0k200020112023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 3,404 kcal/cap/d against 2,305 kcal/cap/d in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1,099 kcal/cap/d.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.5 times Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 37th and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th of 148 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 3,077 kcal/cap/d 2,278 kcal/cap/d 799 kcal/cap/d Latvia
2010s 3,227 kcal/cap/d 2,310 kcal/cap/d 917.2 kcal/cap/d Latvia
2020s 3,324 kcal/cap/d 2,314 kcal/cap/d 1,010 kcal/cap/d Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Latvia or Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
Latvia, at 3,404 kcal/cap/d against 2,305 kcal/cap/d in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Latvia and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
1,099 kcal/cap/d, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
Latvia ranks 37th and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/latvia/oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/latvia/oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/">Latvia vs Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,806 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.