Australia vs Luxembourg: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of

Australia
3,540 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Luxembourg
3,521 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Australia rank
18th
Luxembourg rank
20th

Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time

  • Australia
  • Luxembourg
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200020112023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 3,540 kcal/cap/d against 3,521 kcal/cap/d in Luxembourg, a difference of 19 kcal/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Australia ranks 18th and Luxembourg ranks 20th of 148 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 3,306 kcal/cap/d 3,499 kcal/cap/d 193.2 kcal/cap/d Luxembourg
2010s 3,498 kcal/cap/d 3,416 kcal/cap/d 82.1 kcal/cap/d Australia
2020s 3,526 kcal/cap/d 3,501 kcal/cap/d 24.25 kcal/cap/d Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Australia or Luxembourg?
Australia, at 3,540 kcal/cap/d against 3,521 kcal/cap/d in Luxembourg as of 2023.
What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Australia and Luxembourg?
19 kcal/cap/d, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and Luxembourg rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
Australia ranks 18th and Luxembourg ranks 20th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Luxembourg: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/australia/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/australia/luxembourg/">Australia vs Luxembourg: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,806 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.