Central African Republic vs Ecuador: Cottonseed — Losses

Central African Republic
238 t
in 2013
Ecuador
160.42 t
in 2013
Central African Republic rank
19th
Ecuador rank
21st

Cottonseed — Losses over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Ecuador
05001.0k1.5k196119872013

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 238 t against 160.42 t in Ecuador, a difference of 77.58 t.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.5 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 21st of 35 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 498.67 t 470.22 t 28.44 t Central African Republic
1970s 564 t 701.7 t 137.7 t Ecuador
1980s 462.3 t 741.5 t 279.2 t Ecuador
1990s 355.3 t 606.6 t 251.3 t Ecuador
2000s 93.5 t 190.98 t 97.48 t Ecuador
2010s 178.5 t 158.48 t 20.02 t Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cottonseed — losses, Central African Republic or Ecuador?
Central African Republic, at 238 t against 160.42 t in Ecuador as of 2013.
What is the difference in cottonseed — losses between Central African Republic and Ecuador?
77.58 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ecuador?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Central African Republic and Ecuador rank globally for cottonseed — losses?
Central African Republic ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 21st of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cottonseed — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Ecuador: Cottonseed — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-losses/central-african-republic/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-losses/central-african-republic/ecuador/">Central African Republic vs Ecuador: Cottonseed — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed — Losses
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
62 places, 3,148 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.