Philippines vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cotton lint — Production

Philippines
18 t
in 2013
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2 t
in 2013
Philippines rank
75th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
78th

Cotton lint — Production over time

  • Philippines
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119872013

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 18 t against 2 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 16 t.

That makes Philippines's figure about 9.0 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 75th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 90 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 43.78 t 54.44 t 10.67 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 484.2 t 24.3 t 459.9 t Philippines
1980s 4,790 t 11.6 t 4,778 t Philippines
1990s 3,921 t 3.7 t 3,917 t Philippines
2000s 822.9 t 1 t 821.9 t Philippines
2010s 18 t 1.75 t 16.25 t Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cotton lint — production, Philippines or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Philippines, at 18 t against 2 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2013.
What is the difference in cotton lint — production between Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
16 t, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for cotton lint — production?
Philippines ranks 75th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cotton lint — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-production/philippines/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-production/philippines/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Philippines vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cotton lint — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cotton lint — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
125 places, 6,309 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.