Kyrgyzstan vs Small Island Developing States: Cotton lint β€” Export Quantity

Kyrgyzstan
15,500 t
in 2013
Small Island Developing States
411 t
in 2013
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
Small Island Developing States rank
12th

Cotton lint β€” Export Quantity over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Small Island Developing States
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119872013

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 15,500 t against 411 t in Small Island Developing States, a difference of 15,089 t.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 37.7 times Small Island Developing States's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and Small Island Developing States ranks 12th of 140 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Small Island Developing States Difference Ahead
1990s 15,977 t 928.88 t 15,048 t Kyrgyzstan
2000s 37,877 t 1,314 t 36,563 t Kyrgyzstan
2010s 20,865 t 132.25 t 20,732 t Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cotton lint β€” export quantity, Kyrgyzstan or Small Island Developing States?
Kyrgyzstan, at 15,500 t against 411 t in Small Island Developing States as of 2013.
What is the difference in cotton lint β€” export quantity between Kyrgyzstan and Small Island Developing States?
15,089 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Small Island Developing States?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Small Island Developing States rank globally for cotton lint β€” export quantity?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and Small Island Developing States ranks 12th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cotton lint β€” Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Small Island Developing States: Cotton lint β€” Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-export-quantity/kyrgyz-republic/small-island-developing-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cotton-lint-export-quantity/kyrgyz-republic/small-island-developing-states/">Kyrgyzstan vs Small Island Developing States: Cotton lint β€” Export Quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cotton lint β€” Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
178 places, 8,495 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.