Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Copra Cake — Export Quantity

Australia and New Zealand
14 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries
112 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
21st
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
11th

Copra Cake — Export Quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries currently reports 112 t against 14 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 98 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries's figure about 8.0 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 11th of 77 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1990s 3.9 t 174.8 t 170.9 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2000s 155.4 t 846.6 t 691.2 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2010s 147 t 75 t 72 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher copra cake — export quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries?
Land Locked Developing Countries, at 112 t against 14 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in copra cake — export quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries?
98 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries rank globally for copra cake — export quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 11th of 77 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Copra Cake — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Copra Cake — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/copra-cake-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/copra-cake-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Copra Cake — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Copra Cake — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
112 places, 5,851 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.