Georgia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution

Georgia
0.21 No
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0.21 No
in 2024
Georgia rank
115th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
115th

Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution over time

  • Georgia
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
00.10.20.3200120122024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.21 No against 0.21 No in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0 No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 115th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 115th of 154 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 0.25 No 0.2 No 0.05 No Georgia
2010s 0.25 No 0.2 No 0.05 No Georgia
2020s 0.242 No 0.208 No 0.034 No Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution, Georgia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Georgia, at 0.21 No against 0.21 No in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2024.
What is the difference in coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution between Georgia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0 No, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Georgia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution?
Georgia ranks 115th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 115th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/coefficient-of-variation-of-habitual-caloric-consumption-distribution-real-number-value/georgia/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/coefficient-of-variation-of-habitual-caloric-consumption-distribution-real-number-value/georgia/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Georgia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 4,014 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.