Congo vs Oman: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution
Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution over time
- Congo
- Oman
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.26 No against 0.26 No in Oman, a difference of 0 No.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 69th and Oman ranks 69th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2756 No | 0.26 No | 0.0156 No | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.255 No | 0.26 No | 0.005 No | Oman |
| 2020s | 0.26 No | 0.26 No | 0 No | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution, Congo or Oman?
- Congo, at 0.26 No against 0.26 No in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution between Congo and Oman?
- 0 No, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Oman?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Oman rank globally for coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution?
- Congo ranks 69th and Oman ranks 69th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.