Azerbaijan vs China, Taiwan Province of: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution

Azerbaijan
0.22 No
in 2024
China, Taiwan Province of
0.22 No
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
100th
China, Taiwan Province of rank
100th

Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • China, Taiwan Province of
00.050.10.150.20.25200120122024

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 0.22 No against 0.22 No in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 0 No.

Across all 24 years both countries report, China, Taiwan Province of has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 100th and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 100th of 154 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan China, Taiwan Province of Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2178 No 0.2367 No 0.0189 No China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 0.21 No 0.224 No 0.014 No China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 0.212 No 0.22 No 0.008 No China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution, Azerbaijan or China, Taiwan Province of?
Azerbaijan, at 0.22 No against 0.22 No in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2024.
What is the difference in coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution between Azerbaijan and China, Taiwan Province of?
0 No, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China, Taiwan Province of?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and China, Taiwan Province of rank globally for coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution?
Azerbaijan ranks 100th and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 100th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs China, Taiwan Province of: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/coefficient-of-variation-of-habitual-caloric-consumption-distribution-real-number-value/azerbaijan/china-taiwan-province-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/coefficient-of-variation-of-habitual-caloric-consumption-distribution-real-number-value/azerbaijan/china-taiwan-province-of/">Azerbaijan vs China, Taiwan Province of: Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coefficient of variation of habitual caloric consumption distribution (real number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 4,014 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.