Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square

Guinea-Bissau
12.2 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
11.86 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
95th
Lesotho rank
96th

Cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lesotho
051015196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 12.2 tonnes per square kilometre against 11.86 tonnes per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 0.34 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 95th and Lesotho ranks 96th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3912 tonnes per square kilometre 1.73 tonnes per square kilometre 1.34 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 1.14 tonnes per square kilometre 3.72 tonnes per square kilometre 2.58 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 1.39 tonnes per square kilometre 6.3 tonnes per square kilometre 4.91 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 2.34 tonnes per square kilometre 10.91 tonnes per square kilometre 8.57 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 2.91 tonnes per square kilometre 9.54 tonnes per square kilometre 6.63 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 7.23 tonnes per square kilometre 11.84 tonnes per square kilometre 4.61 tonnes per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 12.05 tonnes per square kilometre 10.28 tonnes per square kilometre 1.77 tonnes per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square, Guinea-Bissau or Lesotho?
Guinea-Bissau, at 12.2 tonnes per square kilometre against 11.86 tonnes per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square between Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
0.34 tonnes per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho rank globally for cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 95th and Lesotho ranks 96th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-which-countries-are-net-importers-and-exporters-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-which-countries-are-net-importers-and-exporters-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/lesotho/">Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters?, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,071 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals: which countries are net importers and exporters? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.