Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Zambia
1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia rank
104th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Zambia ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Zambia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Zambia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.3606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.3418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.3362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6732 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.8608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Zambia or Zimbabwe?
Zambia, at 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
47 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Zambia ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/zambia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/zambia/zimbabwe/">Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.