Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Tunisia
0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
107th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zimbabwe
01234196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 159 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 2.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Tunisia ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zimbabwe/">Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.