Tunisia vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Tunisia
0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
107th
Zambia rank
104th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zambia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.1079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 104th of 159 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 2.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 2.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4385 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Tunisia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Tunisia and Zambia?
0.1079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zambia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Tunisia ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 104th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zambia/">Tunisia vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.