Pakistan vs Romania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Pakistan
18.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
19.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
21st
Romania rank
20th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Romania
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 19.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 18.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Pakistan ranks 21st and Romania ranks 20th of 159 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1970s 4.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 8.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 11.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 14.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2020s 17.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Pakistan or Romania?
Romania, at 19.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 18.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Pakistan and Romania?
0.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Romania rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Pakistan ranks 21st and Romania ranks 20th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Romania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/romania/">Pakistan vs Romania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.