Niger vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Niger
1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger rank
102nd
Zambia rank
104th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Niger
  • Zambia
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Niger ahead.

Niger ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 104th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2722 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1970s 0.2787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.3899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1990s 0.4921 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2000s 0.885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4385 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4465 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2010s 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2020s 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0949 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Niger or Zambia?
Niger, at 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Niger and Zambia?
0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Niger and Zambia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Niger ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 104th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/niger/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/niger/zambia/">Niger vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.